65

exercises/065_builtins2.zig

@@ -40,7 +40,7 @@
 // (Notice how the two functions which return types start with
 // uppercase letters? This is a standard naming practice in Zig.)
 //
-const print = import(std).debug.print; // Oops!
+const print = @import("std").debug.print; // Oops!
 
 const Narcissus = struct {
     me: *Narcissus = undefined,
@@ -57,8 +57,8 @@ pub fn main() void {
 
     // Oops! We cannot leave the 'me' and 'myself' fields
     // undefined. Please set them here:
-    ??? = &narcissus;
-    ??? = &narcissus;
+    narcissus.me = &narcissus;
+    narcissus.myself = &narcissus;
 
     // This determines a "peer type" from three separate
     // references (they just happen to all be the same object).
@@ -68,7 +68,7 @@ pub fn main() void {
     // this function. It is namespaced to the struct, but doesn't
     // use the method syntax (there's no self parameter). Please
     // fix this call:
-    const T2 = narcissus.fetchTheMostBeautifulType();
+    const T2 = Narcissus.fetchTheMostBeautifulType();
 
     print("A {} loves all {}es. ", .{ T1, T2 });
 
@@ -103,15 +103,15 @@ pub fn main() void {
     // Please complete these 'if' statements so that the field
     // name will not be printed if the field is of type 'void'
     // (which is a zero-bit type that takes up no space at all!):
-    if (fields[0].??? != void) {
+    if (fields[0].field_type != void) {
         print(" {s}", .{@typeInfo(Narcissus).Struct.fields[0].name});
     }
 
-    if (fields[1].??? != void) {
+    if (fields[1].field_type != void) {
         print(" {s}", .{@typeInfo(Narcissus).Struct.fields[1].name});
     }
 
-    if (fields[2].??? != void) {
+    if (fields[2].field_type != void) {
         print(" {s}", .{@typeInfo(Narcissus).Struct.fields[2].name});
     }